07 October, 2006

Misleading BBC Afghanistan report: Part 2

The BBC story linked to in my previous post contains a graphic (bottom of page) which could give the impression that, with many more troops, Germany is making a more significant contribution to the ISAF than Canada. Well they are not.

The German troops are safely ensconced in northern Afghanistan, where there is no danger of Taliban shrapnel landing in their sauerkraut and sausages. By contrast, the Canadians have been in southern Afghanistan, in the thick of the action in Kandahar, where they have been suffering a steady stream of fatalities.

The BBC blandly tells us that:

  • 31,000 troops now on ground in Afghanistan, including 10,000 coalition troops moved under Nato command
  • 37 nations contributing
  • 8,000 US-led troops continue training and counter-terrorism separate from Nato force
In fact, of the NATO countries, apart from the Brits and Canucks, only the Dutch and, of course, the Americans have seen serious action. No mention is made of the valuable contribution made by Australia, (not even a NATO member), especially their special forces.

So much for the BBC as a reliable news source.

Misleading BBC report on Afghanistan:

Time was when BBC News could be relied upon to be impartial and to keep you up to date with the latest events. How things have changed.

A month after Max Hastings first raised the problem in the Spectator and a nearly week after Brigadier Ed Butler talked about the problem to the Daily Telegraph, the BBC has finally reported that the army needs more helicopters in Afghanistan.

Brigadier Ed Butler requested more Chinook helicopters in response to a promise by Prime Minister Tony Blair of whatever extra resources were needed.
Somewhat misleadingly, the BBC report gives the impression that Brigadier Butler is only making the request in response to Blair's speech earlier today. An impression reinforced by a quote from an unnamed source:
The Ministry of Defence said it was not aware of a specific request for extra helicopters from Brig Butler. "The commanders have what they need to do the mission, Obviously, if they had more they could do more with it. That is what Brig Butler has always said," am[sic] MoD spokesman said.
A Foreign Office junior minister duly plays his part in the deception saying,
that while British commanders felt they had all of the equipment they needed,they would like more support from some other Nato countries which were not "punching their weight".
Garbage and more garbage. Brigadier Butler's views were clearly expressed his interview in the Telegraph and they are not those ascribed to him by the MoD. Hell, he was 36 hours away from pulling troops out of a battle for a "key base" because of a lack of helicopters. Moreover, as Max Hastings wrote back in early September,
The only reason the army is not crying from the rooftops for more helicopters in Afghanistan — there is no point in sending more men unless there are means to deploy them — is that the resources do not exist. Thus far, the government has not attempted the only possible measure that would help on the margin — leasing more heavy-lift helicopters on the open market...
Only an ambivalent caveat from the BBC man in Kabul is entered:
Alistair Leithead, says the question of extra helicopters has been raised again and again - with other Nato units also wanting more.
More garbage. What other NATO units want is irrelevant to the question, they were not engaged in hand-to-hand comabat with the Taliban in Helmand, which is where the lack of Chinooks was most acutely felt by the combat troops.

The Ministry of Defence has known of the problem for some time and the Prime minister and his Defence secretary should have known also. Any responsible news agency would be highlighting these failings instead of white-washing this stain on the government's record. Our troops deserve better.

Tags: ,

David Blunkett

David Blunkett, the former Home Secretary forced to resign in the wake of an affair, is evidently feeling sorry for himself. No doubt the royalties from his book, which is being pushed in both the right wing Daily Mail and the left wing Guardian will have a therapeutic value.

Like that other great Labour Lothario, John Prescott, Blunkett blames his demise on the scandal-mongering, sex-obsessed media. Wrong. Blunkett deserved, and Prescott ( still a minister) deserves, to be sacked not because they had mistresses but because each abused his office to do favours for his lover.

Blunkett fast tracked a visa application for his mistress' nanny, denied it and was found out only when e-mails between his office and the immigration authorities were unearthed. Prescott used his official car and driver to provide a taxi service for his mistress, an inappropriate use of public funds.

Sympathy for a former Home Secretary caught lying about his abuse of office. I think not.


Tags:

Blair on Afghanistan:

The Daily Telegraph reports that the Prime Minister, Tony Blair, has told the British Forces Broadcasting Service,

"If the commanders on the ground want more equipment, armoured vehicles for example, more helicopters, that will be provided. Whatever package they want we will do".
Better late than never, but we will have to wait and see if his words are matched by deeds.

Still, the Prime Minister will not address the problem of wounded soldiers being threatened by terrorist supporters in civilian hospitals.
Although we're looking, for example, at military-managed wards (in NHS hospitals). To go back to the old military hospitals I don't think would be sensible in this day and age.
On the contrary,with so many enemy sympathisers at large in the community "in this day and age", there is a greater need than ever before for military hospitals.

On one thing Tony Blair was correct:
Our troops have been extraordinary there, I mean truly courageous, to a degree that should give this country enormous pride.
So, Mr Blair, why are they not being treated accordingly.

Corrupting Children made easy.

It is simple. Just place your children under the care of the state. The UK Daily Telegraph has revealed the details of the health fascists' latest strategy for indoctrinating children into their bizarre universe. Under the guise of a schools' drug awareness campaign,

(p)upils as young as seven are being encouraged to act out being drunk at a wedding while 10-year-olds pretend to take ecstasy....
The main teachers' resource is an NHS approved text, Drugs Centre stage (the only live official link I could find is a cached Google page). According to the DT, in one role play the children,
act out the death of a drug user. "I think Gary's ODed. He's not moved for a week and he's starting to smell," says the script.
Gary and the script have something in common: they both stink.

Children's innocence does last for ever; they will all too soon find out what the real world is like. Should the state - the NHS and the Department for Education and Skills -be protecting children from sordid reality or exposing them to it as early as possible? I suppose the answer depends on whether you view children as vulnerable individuals in need of protection or as resources to be exploited in an unscrupulous "health professional's " or teacher's career development.

Tags:

Breast Cancer Helpline Closure:

Just when you think bureaucrats have reached the limits of stupidity, along comes a story like this.

The National Hereditary Breast Cancer Helpline, a 24-hour service founded and run by Derbyshire woman Wendy Watson, is threatened with closure. Is it because there is no demand, or because at £40,000 a year (£4.58 an hour) it is too expensive? No, her local paper, the Derbyshire Times, explains,

... the Department of Health has angered Mrs Watson by telling her she must find her own funding from March next year because it is no longer 'innovative'.
I see, the decision on whether to fund the Helpline is not taken on medical grounds but according to whether or not it fits bureaucratic criteria laid down by some anonymous government official. If the right boxes are not ticked, forget it. It gives a new meaning to the saying, "innovate or die."

06 October, 2006

Why bother voting?

Another party conference season over. Labour spent a week in Manchester blood-letting over Tony Blair's successor as party leader. Conservatives spent their week in Bournemouth talking amongst themselves about the best way to be perceived as caring liberals. And the Liberals no doubt said something important in Brighton but, as usual, nobody was listening. Never has so little been achieved by so many.

Any time now, the politicians are due for another self-pitying bout of asking why the electorate does not take them seriously. They will lament that the 2006 General Election turnout was down to about 60%. and that in local government elections the turnout is often less than half of that figure. Naturally, being very self-important people , MPs will blame voter apathy on the electorate and propose all manner of schemes to prise voters into the ballot box. Never, not even for a second, does it cross their minds that they, the senior figures in the political parties, might be at fault.

What is the point in voting when all the major parties are competing for the same centre ground, merely trying to outdo each other through presentation of similar polices?

Tags:

Injustice, Sharia style.

The Times provides a glimpse of possible things to come in Europe under Sharia "law". In Pakistan, Mirza-Tahir Hussain was found guilty of murder in a case involving highway robbery but after a lengthy legal process,

... the High Court acquitted him. Before Hussain was freed, however, the High Court referred his case to a Sharia court that claims jurisdiction over cases of highway robbery. In that trial in 1998, one of the judges said that the visiting Briton had been framed by police, who had lied in court. But Hussain was given the death penalty by a two-to-one margin and the country’s Sharia Supreme Court rejected subsequent appeals.
Having been freed by the legal system, Hussain was re-arrested by religious police and is going to be executed for a crime for which he has been already legally tried and found not guilty.

Think of that the next time a poll reveals European muslims in favour of the introduction of Sharia in Europe.

Afghaistan: all points bulletin no. 2

The wholly justified security restrictions imposed on reporting military action in Afghanistan create difficulties in formulating a precise assessment of progress in the war between ISAF and Taliban. Any analysis of the strategic picture, is, therefore, partly impressionistic and will reflect more than usually the biases of the analyst. However, even for the sake of argument adopting a most pessimistic perspective, I cannot discern the predicted looming disaster for the ISAF so fervently hoped for by the left. Overall, despite the continuing problems and tragedies, ISAF forces in Afghanistan seem to be making satisfactory progress towards ensuring the country is secure enough to hand back the Afghan government.

In the west, where Operation Wyconda Pincer is going after the Taliban, Crumbling Spires has already reported the Taliban being cleared out of the Golestan district of Farah province. Now, from the east, comes news of an Operation Mountain Fury success in Ghazni province. Elsewhere, in the area, the Afghan authorities have themselves arrested 17 would-be suicide bombers. The south remains problematical but, for now at least, Taliban activity seem to have been reduced from full scale attacks to individual suicide bombings. In isolation these reports might not appear to amount to very much but, taken as a whole, they send a signal to the Talbian that it cannot operate with impunity even in areas it formerly regarded as strongholds.

The one dark shadow looming over the entire ISAF operation originates to the east, in Pakistan, where the surrender of Waziristan to the Taliban has provided the terrorists with a secure base and raised serious questions about the Pakistan government's attitude towards Islamic terrorism.

RAF bombing Taliban: videos,

The Ministry of Defence has released video footage from Afghanistan of RAF Harriers visiting the Taliban. The videos can be downloaded from the related links section on here.

Jack Straw

Jack Straw upsets the mediaeval brigade with this.

Not even a veiled comment yet on the rights of wimmin from Labour's post-modernist harridan tendency.

By my count that is two government ministers and the Chief Rabbi that have recently uttered multi-cultural heresy. It is suddenly getting crowded on the far shores of the right.

05 October, 2006

Afghanistan Reference

This page is intended as an Afghanistan database for future easy reference. It is not intended to be exhaustive, rather it lists the main UK and US government and Afghanistan news sites I have bookmarked over the last few months. I hope it proves useful to anyone seeking background information or news on Afghanistan.

Map of Afghan Provinces:


From: Afghana.com. Click on map to enlarge.


CIA World Factbook: Afghanistan

US State Department: Briefing Notes

Foreign Office: Country profile (updated 18.12.06)

Ministry of Defence

Department of Defense

Centcom- Afghanistan

International security Assistance Force (ISAF)

NATO

The Durand Line

United Nations

Afgha.com news

Afghanistan's website

Afghan Daily

Wikipedia, much maligned in some quarters but useful for quick reference and links.

BBC South Asia

Last, but certainly not least, Google News